Understanding the Burden of Proof in Maryland Assault Cases

In the state of Maryland, assault cases are treated with the utmost seriousness. When someone is charged with assault, the legal process requires a thorough examination of evidence to establish guilt or innocence. Central to this process is the concept of the burden of proof, a fundamental principle that dictates which party in a legal dispute is responsible for presenting evidence to support their claims. Understanding the burden of proof in Maryland assault cases is crucial for anyone involved in such legal proceedings, whether as a defendant, victim, or legal professional.

BDG-cert
top-100-trial-lawyers
maryland-superlawyers
founding-member-of-the-dui-defense-lawyer-assocaition
badge
avvo-10-10-superb-rated
av-preeminent-rating
america-s-top-100-attorneys
acs-chal-forensic-lawyer-scientist
dc-super-lawyers
ncdd-faculty
expert-network-distinguished-lawyer
lawyer-com
av-preeminent-rating-2018
2018-lawyers-of-distinction
proud-fellows-american-bar-association

The Definition of Assault in Maryland

Before delving into the specifics of the burden of proof, it is essential to understand what constitutes assault under Maryland law. Assault is generally defined as the intentional infliction of bodily harm or the threat of imminent bodily harm to another person. Maryland law categorizes assault into two main degrees: first-degree and second-degree. First-degree assault involves serious physical injury or the use of a firearm, while second-degree assault covers less severe physical harm or threats.

The Legal Standard: Beyond a Reasonable Doubt

In criminal cases, including assault, the prosecution bears the burden of proof. This means that it is the responsibility of the state to prove the defendant’s guilt. The standard of proof required in criminal cases is “beyond a reasonable doubt.” This is the highest standard of proof in the legal system, reflecting the serious consequences that a criminal conviction can entail. To meet this standard, the prosecution must present evidence that leaves no reasonable doubt in the minds of the jurors regarding the defendant’s guilt.

Andrew D. Alpert

Founding Partner

Michael J. Schreyer

Founding Partner

Michael Berman

Attorney

Jason Miller

Attorney

The Role of Evidence in Assault Cases

The burden of proof in assault cases hinges on the evidence presented. Evidence can take various forms, including physical evidence, witness testimony, and opinions. Physical evidence might include medical reports documenting injuries, photographs, or video footage. Witness testimony can come from the victim, bystanders, or others who have relevant information about the incident. The opinions, such as those from medical professionals, can provide insights into the nature and extent of injuries sustained.

Direct and Circumstantial Evidence

Evidence in assault cases can be either direct or circumstantial. Direct evidence directly links the defendant to the crime, such as a video recording of the assault or an eyewitness account. Circumstantial evidence, on the other hand, requires inference. For example, if a defendant was seen fleeing the scene of an assault, this might be considered circumstantial evidence of their involvement. Both types of evidence can be compelling, but direct evidence often carries more weight in proving a case beyond a reasonable doubt.

Quote

With criminal charges starting at age 18 and I’m now 45 I recently got a subsequent charge. Working hard at family and work life over the years this would have ruined it all. Stressed to the max I searched for the person who could do what others couldn’t. They structured a plan for me and I walked today from court. Being no stranger to the courtroom he was more than impressive, he owned it. Be honest with him, do what he says and you will no doubt be in the best possible position you could be in when you walk in with him. From the bottom of heart I thank you and your team for all that you did!”

- Ryan W.

The Defense’s Role in Assault Cases

While the prosecution bears the burden of proof, the defense has the opportunity to challenge the evidence presented and offer alternative explanations. The defense might present its own evidence, such as alibi witnesses who can testify that the defendant was elsewhere at the time of the assault. Additionally, the defense can cross-examine the prosecution’s witnesses to uncover inconsistencies or weaknesses in their testimony. The goal of the defense is to create reasonable doubt in the minds of the jurors, thereby preventing the prosecution from meeting its burden of proof.

Self-Defense and Other Affirmative Defenses

In some assault cases, the defendant might raise an affirmative defense, such as self-defense. An affirmative defense acknowledges that the defendant engaged in the alleged conduct but argues that it was justified under the circumstances. For example, if the defendant claims they acted in self-defense, they must provide evidence showing that they reasonably believed they were in imminent danger of harm and that their response was proportionate to the threat. While the burden of proof remains on the prosecution to prove the defendant’s guilt, the defendant has the burden of producing evidence to support their affirmative defense.

Jury Instructions and Deliberations

At the conclusion of an assault trial, the judge provides instructions to the jury regarding the law and the standards they must apply when deliberating on the case. These instructions emphasize the requirement for the prosecution to prove the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Jurors are reminded that if they have any reasonable doubt about the defendant’s guilt, they must acquit. During deliberations, jurors carefully review the evidence, discuss their interpretations, and strive to reach a unanimous verdict.

Related Videos

Steps to Take if You Were Arrested Today

Probable Cause

Challenges in Meeting the Burden of Proof

Proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt can be challenging, particularly in assault cases where evidence may be limited or conflicting. Witnesses might have differing accounts of the incident, or physical evidence might be inconclusive. Additionally, the passage of time can affect the availability and reliability of evidence. These challenges underscore the importance of thorough investigation and preparation by both the prosecution and defense to present a compelling case.

The Consequences of Failing to Meet the Burden of Proof

If the prosecution fails to meet the burden of proof, the defendant must be acquitted. An acquittal means that the defendant is found not guilty of the charges and is free from the threat of punishment for that particular incident. It is important to note that an acquittal does not necessarily mean that the defendant is innocent; rather, it means that the prosecution did not provide sufficient evidence to meet the high standard of proof required for a conviction. The principle of “innocent until proven guilty” is a cornerstone of the American legal system, ensuring that individuals are not punished without adequate evidence of their guilt.

Verdicts & Settlements

DUI

All Charges Dropped

Found in his parked car with a friend and some open bottles, our client was facing a fourth DUI offense, along with 3 years of prison time and 2 more for probation violation. We didn’t back down in court, and the state dropped all charges after a short recess. Our client did not receive jail time, points, or probation – and he only paid a $50 fine.

DUI

Probationary Deal on a Second Offense

Our client had a .18 BAC in a notoriously heavy-handed jurisdiction, Harford County, where people can easily do 60 days active time on a second offense. Our firm negotiated a plea deal for our client that achieved no conviction, no points, and no jail. The Judge was incredibly impressed with the mitigation package we presented on behalf of client, who was very pleased with the results.

DUI

No Jail Sentence

Our firm secured a no-jail sentence for our client from a very tough Judge in Frederick County. Our client blew a .20 on a third offense, and the prosecutor was asking for active jail time. The Judge said the mitigation package we devised for the client made all the difference and led him to ignore the prosecutor’s jail recommendation in favor of just probation.

DUI

Charge Reduced

One of our DUI clients was facing up to 1 year in jail if convicted, plus $1000 in fines, 12 points on her driving record, and 3 years of supervised probation. By negotiating with the prosecution, we were able to secure a much better result. Our client did not receive a conviction, points, or jail time – instead, she paid only a few hundred dollars and received 1 year of unsupervised probation.

DUI

Not Guilty

After his fifth DUI charge, our client was facing up to 3 years in prison for a conviction. By showing that the field sobriety test result was affected by the client’s disability, our defense attorneys were able to secure a “not guilty” verdict on all counts, after the jury deliberated for only 12 minutes.

DUI

Probationary Deal on 6th Offense

After being arrested for their sixth DUI, our client faced 3 years in jail, up to $3,000 in fines, and a system inclined to award maximum penalties to repeat offenders. Our team managed to secure a probationary deal with no jail time for this client.

The Importance of Legal Representation

Given the complexities and high stakes involved in assault cases, having skilled legal representation is crucial. Both the prosecution and defense require experienced attorneys who can navigate the intricacies of the law, present evidence effectively, and advocate persuasively on behalf of their clients. For defendants, a knowledgeable attorney can help ensure that their rights are protected, that they receive a fair trial, and that the burden of proof is properly applied.

The Role of Alpert Schreyer, LLC in Assault Cases

At Alpert Schreyer, LLC, we understand the profound impact that an assault charge can have on an individual’s life. Our dedicated legal team is committed to providing vigorous representation to those facing assault charges in Maryland. We work diligently to investigate the circumstances of each case, gather and analyze evidence, and build a strong defense to challenge the prosecution’s claims. Our goal is to ensure that our clients receive a fair trial and that the burden of proof is upheld.

If you or a loved one is facing assault charges in Maryland, it is imperative to seek legal assistance as soon as possible. The legal process can be overwhelming, and having a knowledgeable attorney by your side can make a significant difference in the outcome of your case. At Alpert Schreyer, LLC, we are dedicated to protecting your rights and providing the highest level of legal representation. Contact us today to schedule a consultation and learn how we can assist you in navigating the complexities of your assault case. Your future and freedom are too important to leave to chance; let us help you achieve the best possible outcome.